Legislature(2011 - 2012)BARNES 124
04/09/2012 01:00 PM House RESOURCES
Audio | Topic |
---|---|
Start | |
HB295 | |
SB91 | |
HB328 | |
Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
*+ | HB 295 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | SB 91 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+= | HB 328 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+= | SB 192 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | TELECONFERENCED |
SB 91-SPORT FISHING GUIDING SERVICES 1:35:31 PM CO-CHAIR FEIGE announced that the next order of business would be CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 91(FIN), "An Act amending the termination date of the licensing of sport fishing operators and sport fishing guides; and providing for an effective date." 1:35:44 PM SHYAN ELY, Intern, Senator Lesil McGuire, Alaska State Legislature, explained the proposed bill: SB [9]1 guarantees the continuation of the sport fish guide licensing and reporting program as well as provides an effective date. SB 91 extends the sunset date of the program which is already in place. Legislation for this program was first passed in 2004. This program has proven to be beneficial to the sport fishing industry as well as resource managers. It requires licensing and regulation of sport fishing operators and sport fishing guides and sport fishing vessels. The program has provided an average of 1,541 sport fishing business licenses and 1,828 sport fishing guide licenses annually. Ninety percent of the license holders are Alaska residents. The sport fishing guide industry has taken more than 2.6 million clients fishing from 2005 - 2010, totaling more than 625,000 guided fishing trips in Alaska. Guided sport fishing has become an integral part of Alaska's tourism economy. In 2007, $1.39 billion was spent on licensing and stamps, trip related expenditures, fishing packages, equipment, and real estate use for the fishing. This spending supported more than 15,879 jobs in Alaska and provided $545.3 million in income. This bill has provided an accurate accounting for Alaska's resources which are being harvested. Federal law for guided halibut sport fishing is tied to the Alaska sport fishing log books and failure to keep this program in place would likely result in the development of federal log book for halibut which would create duplication of efforts at a later date. 1:37:39 PM MS. ELY pointed out that Alaska was exempt from participation in the NOAA National Saltwater Angler Registry as a result of the information collected from the guide license program. She urged support for proposed SB 91. 1:38:02 PM REPRESENTATIVE GARDNER asked about the function of the National Saltwater Angler Registry, and why Alaska should be exempt. 1:38:30 PM MS. ELY deferred to the Alaska Department of Fish & Game (ADF&G). 1:38:45 PM REPRESENTATIVE MUNOZ asked if the logbooks were manual or data entry. MS. ELY offered her belief that the logs were now entered electronically. REPRESENTATIVE MUNOZ opined that previously there had been additional cost for ADF&G to electronically enter the log book data. She asked whether there had been a savings to the state by going to an electronic system instead of the previous manual entry. MS. ELY deferred to the Alaska Department of Fish & Game (ADF&G). 1:39:33 PM REPRESENTATIVE KAWASAKI observed that there were licenses required for many occupations; however, this industry did not have a licensing board. MS. ELY replied that she would research this. 1:40:19 PM REPRESENTATIVE DICK, directing attention to the sponsor statement, asked what was included in the estimated $650 million spent on sport fishing in 2007. MS. ELY offered her belief that it was general spending. She offered to research the specific spending. REPRESENTATIVE DICK questioned whether this entire income would disappear without sport fishing. MS. ELY, in response, said that she would get back to the committee if ADF&G was unable to answer the question. 1:41:44 PM LISA EVANS, Assistant Director, Division of Sport Fishing, Alaska Department of Fish & Game (ADF&G), stated that the sport fish guide licensing program was an important tool for the management of state fisheries. She reported that ADF&G collected the data and used it extensively for regulatory options and decisions by the International Pacific Halibut Commission and the North Pacific Fisheries Management Council to maintain the "least conservative regulatory structure possible." She added that the fisheries managers documented the harvest patterns within specific time frames, and used that data to evaluate and update the ADF&G regulatory structure for specific species to ensure maximum opportunity for fishing. She said that the information from the angler harvest logbooks was collected and used in decision making. She gave examples for decisions made to the Kodiak and Southeast Alaska fisheries based on logbook information. MS. EVANS relayed that ADF&G had responded to the concerns from the sport fish guides industry for data turnaround time, however there was still not an electronic logbook for the guides. She said that the logbook information was now scanned, rather than entered manually, which had significantly improved the time for which the data was now available, and that this system would be implemented for freshwater data entry, as well, during the upcoming season. She shared that the research for an electronic system was ongoing. She estimated that sport fishing was a $1.4 billion industry in Alaska in 2007, which included trip related expenditures such as airfare, lodging, equipment, and guide services. She declared that the proposed bill was a necessary fisheries management tool. 1:45:23 PM REPRESENTATIVE GARDNER inquired whether the funds that were raised through the program generated a sufficient amount of income. She asked for an explanation of the National Saltwater Angler Registry program, and the reason for the proposed exemption. MS. EVANS replied that there was a $400,000 fiscal note attached to proposed SB 91. She reported that the program generated about $250,000 in receipts, with the balance paid by the ADF&G sport fish license sales. She explained that the National Saltwater Angler Registry program was a new NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) program which now required a saltwater fishing license for harvest data collection for saltwater sport fisheries. She relayed that Alaska had received an exemption from this NOAA program because of its existing statewide harvest survey and the guide logbook program. REPRESENTATIVE GARDNER asked to clarify that, as the NOAA registry was mainly for data collection and Alaska already collected this data, Alaska could be exempt from the NOAA registry. MS. EVANS concurred. 1:47:05 PM REPRESENTATIVE KAWASAKI asked why there was not yet a fully electronic log book system, and he questioned how the proposed funding would be used to attain this system. MS. EVANS replied that the number of staff on this program had not been reduced. She expressed the possibility for more efficiency with implementation of the freshwater log book system. She stated that an electronic program, which was cost effective, had not yet been found. She relayed that the current estimate for an electronic system was up to $1.25 million. She noted an additional obstacle, the sport fish license system was not yet completely electronic at point of sale. CO-CHAIR FEIGE asked for a description of the format that was scanned. MS. EVANS offered her belief that it was a scanned copy of the actual logbook page, and then software read the sport fish license number, the individual, and the number of fish released. She said that she would get back to the committee to confirm. CO-CHAIR FEIGE inquired whether the department had looked into application software. MS. EVANS replied that the department had a small team researching options that had been implemented elsewhere. CO-CHAIR FEIGE expressed his agreement that the data was useful and allowed precise quantification of what was being taken. MS. EVANS, in response to Co-Chair Feige, said that 80 - 85 percent of the public and the sport fish industry were in supported of the guide logbook program. She allowed that some had expressed that the program was cumbersome and not essential. CO-CHAIR FEIGE asked if most complaints were for not wanting to participate, or just opposition on a general basis. MS. EVANS allowed that it was cumbersome to fill out the logbook while on the water with clients and that there had been some objection to the $100 annual license fee. 1:52:41 PM REPRESENTATIVE KAWASAKI expressed that his objection, from the very beginning, had been regarding the necessity of this program. Even though he understood the value of the data, he did not like imposing any additional licensing requirements on sport fish guides. He questioned whether there was a better way to enforce compliance to collect the necessary information. 1:54:13 PM REPRESENTATIVE MUNOZ moved to report CSSB 91(FIN) out of committee with individual recommendations and the accompanying fiscal notes. There being no objection, CSSB 91(FIN) was reported from the House Resources Standing Committee.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|---|---|
Support Alyeska.pdf |
HRES 4/9/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 295 |
HB295 Background - MO 1121.pdf |
HRES 4/9/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 295 |
Work Draft 2012.04.04.pdf |
HRES 4/9/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 295 |
HB295 Bill Text.pdf |
HRES 4/9/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 295 |
HB295 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HRES 4/9/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 295 |
HB295 Support Letters.pdf |
HRES 4/9/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 295 |
91 CSSB Verson M.pdf |
HRES 4/9/2012 1:00:00 PM |
SB 91 |
HB 328 Workdraft Version E.pdf |
HRES 4/9/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 328 |
SB 91_Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HRES 4/9/2012 1:00:00 PM |
SB 91 |
SB 91 2010 Participation Effort and Harvest in the Sport Fish Business-Guide Licensing and Logbook Programs.pdf |
HRES 4/9/2012 1:00:00 PM |
SB 91 |
SB 91 SWLogsheet_2012.pdf |
HRES 4/9/2012 1:00:00 PM |
SB 91 |
SB091CS(FIN)-03-30-12.pdf |
HRES 4/9/2012 1:00:00 PM |
SB 91 |
SB 91 2012 Freshwater Charter Logbook.pdf |
HRES 4/9/2012 1:00:00 PM |
SB 91 |